Jostock & Jostock,P.A.

FDIC as Receiver for Ravenswood Bank v. Republic Title – implied waiver and laches

FDIC as Receiver for Ravenswood Bank v. Republic Title – implied waiver and laches

On April 20, 2011, The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois stated in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Ravenswood Bank v. Republic Title Company (2011 WL 1526817) as follows:

In regards to Implied Waivers

Waiver is defined by Illinois law as “the intentional relinquishment of a known right.”  Ryder v. Bank of Hickory Hills,  146 Ill.2d 98, 165 Ill.Dec. 650, 585 N.E.2d 46, 49 (Ill.1991). Waiver may be demonstrated by an express agreement or it may be “implied from the conduct of the party who is alleged to have waived a right.”  Id.  The implied waiver of a legal right must be proved by “a clear, unequivocal, and decisive act of the party who is alleged to have committed waiver.”  Id.  “An implied waiver may arise where a person against whom the waiver is asserted has pursued such a course of conduct as to sufficiently evidence an intention to waive a right or where his conduct is inconsistent with any other intention than to waive it.”  Id.

In regards to  Laches

The doctrine of laches is grounded in the principle that courts are reluctant to come to the aid of a party who knowingly slept on its rights to the detriment of another party.  Monson v. County of Grundy,  394 Ill.App.3d 1091, 334 Ill.Dec. 205, 916 N.E.2d 620, 623 (Ill.App.3d Dist.2009). Laches is “the neglect or omission to assert a right which, taken in conjunction with a lapse of time and circumstances causing prejudice to the opposite party, will operate as a bar to a suit.”  Bill v. Bd. of Educ. of Cicero Sch. Dist. 99,  351 Ill.App.3d 47, 285 Ill.Dec. 784, 812 N.E.2d 604, 610 (Ill.App. 1st Dist.2004). To invoke the defense of laches, the defendant must establish that the plaintiff has exhibited an unreasonable delay in asserting a claim and that it has suffered a prejudice as a result of the delay.  Monson,  334 Ill.Dec. 205, 916 N.E.2d at 623. It is not enough simply to point to the passage of time.  Marsaw v. Richards,  368 Ill.App.3d 418, 306 Ill.Dec. 395, 857 N.E.2d 794, 804 (Ill.App. 1st Dist.2006). Rather, laches depends on some change in the condition or relation of the property and the parties.  Renth v. Krausz,  219 Ill.App.3d 120, 161 Ill.Dec. 754, 579 N.E.2d 11, 13 (Ill.App. 5th Dist.1991). The element of prejudice is critical, and Illinois courts have in some circumstances imposed laches to bar suits brought before the statute of limitations has expired.  Id; see also  Maksym v. Loesch,  937 F.2d 1237,1248 (7th Cir.1991)  (stating that laches is “really a doctrine of estoppel rather than a substitute for a statute of limitations”);  The  Nature Conservancy v. Wilder Corp.,  No. 06–1096, 2009 WL 1492177 (C.D.Ill. May 28, 2009).

*5  Traditionally, the doctrine of laches only applied in suits in equity and was unavailable in suits at law. In 1991, the Seventh Circuit observed in  Maksym  that every case that its research had located in which the court had said that laches is a defense at law as well as equity turned out to be quasi-equitable and not a pure damages suit.  Maksym,  937 F.2d at 1248. The following year, however, the Illinois appellate court concluded (albeit in a statement not necessary to the disposition) that laches defeated a claim for money damages.  Kotsias v. Continental Bank, N.A.,  235 Ill.App.3d 472, 176 Ill.Dec. 487, 601 N.E.2d 1185, 1189–90 (Ill.App. 1st Dist.1992). Recently, the Illinois appellate court concluded that Illinois courts routinely apply laches in lawsuits simultaneously seeking both legal and equitable remedies, but there is still disagreement among Illinois courts as to whether laches is an appropriate defense to suits seeking only monetary damages.  Valdovinos v. Tomita,  394 Ill.App.3d 14, 333 Ill.Dec. 14, 914 N.E.2d 221, 226 (Ill.App. 1st Dist.2009)  (  citing, inter alia,  Kotsias,  176 Ill.Dec. 487, 601 N.E.2d at 1189–90).

Follow Us


Search Blog


Recent Posts


What is Probate Lawyers
04 Sep, 2023
Probate attorneys can offer support and guidance to help simplify complicated tasks and offer guidance throughout the process.
Employee Retention Tax Credit
28 Aug, 2023
The Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERTC) can financially assist struggling businesses. Here’s How to Claim ERTC.
Naples estate planning attorney
21 Aug, 2023
Asset protection planning is the process of building barriers around your assets. Estate planning generally consists of creating a plan for preserving and distributing your assets after you die.
What is Probate Process in Florida
07 Aug, 2023
What Are The Steps of the Probate Process in Florida? Probate is a court-supervised process for identifying and gathering the assets of a deceased person (decedent).
Florida Tax Lawyers
31 Jul, 2023
Stay informed on the latest Florida Sales Tax updates for 2023 with Jostock & Jostock. Explore key changes and insights in our comprehensive guide to ensure compliance and financial success.
Share by: